of the output stage. This noise will then be presented to the grid of the top triode. Why introduce noise here? The answer is that noise must be added to the top triode's grid to balance the noise added to the bottom triode's grid. But the bottom triode's grid sees only the attenuated drive signal? True enough, but the bottom triode's cathode sees the power supply noise from the negative rail, which effectively makes the triode respond identically to having its grid receive the noise signal. Since we could not easily add the negative rail noise to the signal the bottom triode's grid sees, we must add noise to the top triode to cancel the noise from the bottom triode. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
grid-to-cathode voltage increases by +1 volt at the peak of the signal, whereas the bottom triode's grid sees the result of the -10 volt pulse minus the +9 volt pulse at the output, a -1 volt decrease in grid-to-cathode voltage. If the output is forced 1 volt positive, then the top triode's grid becomes effectively -1 volt more negative and the triode conducts much less current. The bottom triode's grid, on the other hand, sees the full positive pulse and it becomes +1 volt more positive and the triode conducts much more current. Thus the effective output impedance equals one half that of the top Cathode Follower, as the bottom triode is effectively working in parallel with the top triode. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The bottom triode, on the other hand, sees the negative rail noise at its grid; thus, canceling the noise at its cathode. This variation might make the better sounding amplifier because of the different noise nulling technique. An informative shootout would be one between these two circuits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||