|
Mr. Rozenblit does not hedge his answers or hide his low regard for the sillier fringe of the hobby. This will no doubt please those who side with him and, somewhat surprisingly, those who wish to dismiss his book without having to bother to read it. "He doesn't use tantalum resistors; he must be either insensitive to musical nuance or an idiot," I can hear them saying as they look down the parts list. I am sure that their criticisms do not inflict much torment on Mr. Rozenblit, as he has a very healthy outlook on the endeavor called high-end audio, which he refers to as "….a wonderful hobby, pastime, and intellectual pursuit." He let us know very quickly that he does not see it as a salvation, a mystical greed, a path to nirvana, or a social status footstool. In fact, Spilling the Tube Audio Beans might have been a better title to Mr. Rozenblit's book. I find the book's title seems poorly matched to its table of contents. The book is divided into two parts: "Audio Science" and "Projects." he covers how do the components work and physics behind the components in the first half of the book and five projects of his own design in the second half. Throughout the book, but particularly in the introduction and the last words of the book, he gives us his views concerning these doings, his philosophy of audio design; hence, the title Audio Reality. Still, I find the title ill-fitted to a book that recommends common sense and frugality as needed virtues in a hobby as weird, farcical, and irrational as Audio can be at times. While voicing my complaint concerning the book's title and it its contents to my wife, Anna, she replied that An Insider's Guide to Tube Audio Design would be a better choice. I agree. Ironically, while Mr. Rozenblit's attempts to present the more sober side of tube audio, the vast bulk of electrical engineers will see him as being part of the fringe. Sobriety is relative. I remember in college the engineering student saying, "Sure I love physics too, but what are you going to do with it to make a living?" And
|
|